From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755202AbaAURNJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:13:09 -0500 Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:32910 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754788AbaAURNG (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:13:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:12:34 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "H.J. Lu" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex Message-ID: <20140121171233.GE20798@arm.com> References: <1388165112-6545-1-git-send-email-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <1388165112-6545-2-git-send-email-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20140121165803.GC20798@arm.com> <52DEA84D.2090306@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52DEA84D.2090306@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 05:03:09PM +0000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/21/2014 08:58 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > BTW, could we not avoid the #if and always use __kernel_long_t? This > > wouldn't break the user ABI. > > Ah yes, this is the wrong version of the patchset. I already gave that > feedback and H.J. posted an update. My bad. Ah, I have to dig a newer version then. -- Catalin