From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932082AbaAWPLd (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:11:33 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:55642 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753063AbaAWPLb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:11:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:11:23 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Linus Walleij Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Torokhov , Linux Input , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] mfd: tc3589x: Reform device tree probing Message-ID: <20140123151123.GE8586@lee--X1> References: <1390481008-23900-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20140123133141.GD8586@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Patch looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should rush this in > > for v3.14, or is it okay to go to -next? > > No rush, but it's been on review like forever so unless there is > some noise from the DT people at -rc1 I'd be very happy if you > could apply patches 1 & 2 by then. I'm just waiting for their Ack. If I don't have it soon I'll review it myself and any changes will have to come in via subsequent patch submissions. I think it's sensible to head for v3.15 for this set. > The third one can be applied out-of-order to the input tree after > that. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog