From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ipi_redirect vs rq_affinity
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:22:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140124132234.GA8553@infradead.org> (raw)
Hi Jens,
it seems like blk-mq uses the ipi_redirect attribute in pretty much the
same way as the old blk-softirq code used the rq_affinity one, except
that the old code has an additional option to direct into any core in
the current package.
Is there any good reason to not reuse the old name and semantics?
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-24 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 13:22 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-01-24 19:11 ` ipi_redirect vs rq_affinity Jens Axboe
2014-01-27 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-27 19:16 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140124132234.GA8553@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox