From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754064AbaA0RYj (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:24:39 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:35467 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753539AbaA0RYh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:24:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:24:28 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andi Kleen , Jiri Kosina , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Michael Matz , Michal Hocko , lkml Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: Disable traditional FPU instructions too Message-ID: <20140127172428.GF6839@pd.tnic> References: <20140127163758.GC6839@pd.tnic> <52E68C25.1070804@zytor.com> <87ha8pqryl.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <52E69464.4010705@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52E69464.4010705@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:16:20AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > checkpatch would seem to be the right place to check for this? checkpatch is not mandatory. > Ideally gcc should have a -no-float option... Yeah. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --