From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jason.low2@hp.com,
Waiman.Long@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, aswin@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:12:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128121236.GC3998@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390882362.27421.22.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Em Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:12:42PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 10:13 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > I agree that we should take whatever makes sense for perf out of
> > futex-test and merge it with perf. It will see greater use and receive
> > more review and improvements than it will in my obscure repository.
> > With trinity covering the fuzz testing and perf handling performance
> > tests, I think futex-test can be reduced down to a functional
> > test-suite, which is perfectly fine with me.
> > If there is still interest here, I'll support it.
> Arnaldo, could you consider this for 3.15? I've also got some additional
> work for perf-bench but am waiting for this to get settled first.
Sure, I'll try applying it later today.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-15 4:31 [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-15 4:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf-bench: add futex-hash microbenchmark Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-18 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-15 4:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf-bench: add futex-wake microbenchmark Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-16 5:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-16 14:45 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-18 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-15 4:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf-bench: add futex-requeue microbenchmark Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-18 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-16 10:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks Ingo Molnar
2013-12-16 14:44 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-01-24 18:13 ` Darren Hart
2014-01-28 4:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-01-28 12:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128121236.GC3998@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox