From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] de-asmify the x86-64 system call slowpath
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:38:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128163730.GA7596@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140128011841.GG10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 01/28, Al Viro wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:39:31PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 01/27, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > Why is _TIF_UPROBE *not* a part
> > > of _TIF_DO_NOTIFY_MASK, for example?
> >
> > Yes, please see another email. That is why uprobe_deny_signal()
> > sets TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME along with TIF_UPROBE.
>
> *grumble* Can it end up modifying *regs? From very cursory reading of
> kernel/events/uprobe.c it seems to do so, so we probably want to leave
> via iretq if that has hit, right?
But we do this anyway, restore_args path does iretq?
I mean, uprobe_notify_resume() is called from do_notify_resume(), it
should be fine to modify*regs there?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-26 22:28 [RFC] de-asmify the x86-64 system call slowpath Linus Torvalds
2014-01-27 0:22 ` Al Viro
2014-01-27 4:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-27 4:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-27 7:42 ` Al Viro
2014-01-27 22:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-27 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-27 22:32 ` Al Viro
2014-01-27 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-27 22:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-28 0:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-28 0:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-27 23:07 ` Al Viro
2014-01-27 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 11:36 ` Al Viro
2014-01-27 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-28 1:18 ` Al Viro
2014-01-28 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-01-28 16:48 ` Al Viro
2014-01-28 17:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-06 0:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-06 0:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-02-06 2:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-06 4:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-06 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-06 22:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-02-07 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-07 15:42 ` [RFC, PATCH] mm: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-02-07 17:32 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-07 17:56 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-02-07 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-06 5:42 ` [RFC] de-asmify the x86-64 system call slowpath Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128163730.GA7596@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).