From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, pjt@google.com,
bsegall@google.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] sched: Push put_prev_task() into pick_next_task()
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:16:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128171948.149077289@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140128171634.974847076@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peter_zijlstra-sched-optimize_cgroup_pick_next_task_fair_2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6171 bytes --]
In order to avoid having to do put/set on a whole cgroup hierarchy
when we context switch, push the put into pick_next_task() so that
both operations are in the same function. Further changes then allow
us to possibly optimize away redundant work.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +++-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/idle_task.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/rt.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +++++++-
kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 14 ++++++++------
7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2556,18 +2556,11 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct
schedstat_inc(this_rq(), sched_count);
}
-static void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
-{
- if (prev->on_rq || rq->skip_clock_update < 0)
- update_rq_clock(rq);
- prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
-}
-
/*
* Pick up the highest-prio task:
*/
static inline struct task_struct *
-pick_next_task(struct rq *rq)
+pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
const struct sched_class *class;
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -2577,13 +2570,13 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq)
* the fair class we can call that function directly:
*/
if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) {
- p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq);
+ p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev);
if (likely(p))
return p;
}
for_each_class(class) {
- p = class->pick_next_task(rq);
+ p = class->pick_next_task(rq, prev);
if (p)
return p;
}
@@ -2691,8 +2684,10 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
rq->idle_stamp = 0;
}
- put_prev_task(rq, prev);
- next = pick_next_task(rq);
+ if (prev->on_rq || rq->skip_clock_update < 0)
+ update_rq_clock(rq);
+
+ next = pick_next_task(rq, prev);
clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
clear_preempt_need_resched();
rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
@@ -4734,7 +4729,7 @@ static void migrate_tasks(unsigned int d
if (rq->nr_running == 1)
break;
- next = pick_next_task(rq);
+ next = pick_next_task(rq, NULL);
BUG_ON(!next);
next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next);
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static struct sched_dl_entity *pick_next
return rb_entry(left, struct sched_dl_entity, rb_node);
}
-struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
+struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -1000,6 +1000,8 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(st
if (unlikely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running))
return NULL;
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+
dl_se = pick_next_dl_entity(rq, dl_rq);
BUG_ON(!dl_se);
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4659,7 +4659,8 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct
set_last_buddy(se);
}
-static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct task_struct *p;
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
@@ -4668,6 +4669,8 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
return NULL;
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+
do {
se = pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se);
--- a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
@@ -33,8 +33,11 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(stru
resched_task(rq->idle);
}
-static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq)
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+
schedstat_inc(rq, sched_goidle);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* Trigger the post schedule to do an idle_enter for CFS */
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1310,15 +1310,7 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_ta
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
struct task_struct *p;
- struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
-
- rt_rq = &rq->rt;
-
- if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
- return NULL;
-
- if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq))
- return NULL;
+ struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
do {
rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rq, rt_rq);
@@ -1332,9 +1324,21 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_ta
return p;
}
-static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
- struct task_struct *p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
+ struct task_struct *p;
+ struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
+
+ if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq))
+ return NULL;
+
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+
+ p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
if (p)
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1123,7 +1123,13 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
- struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task) (struct rq *rq);
+ /*
+ * It is the responsibility of the pick_next_task() method that will
+ * return the next task to call put_prev_task() on the @prev task or
+ * something equivalent.
+ */
+ struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task) (struct rq *rq,
+ struct task_struct *prev);
void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -23,16 +23,18 @@ check_preempt_curr_stop(struct rq *rq, s
/* we're never preempted */
}
-static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop;
- if (stop && stop->on_rq) {
- stop->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
- return stop;
- }
+ if (!stop || !stop->on_rq)
+ return NULL;
- return NULL;
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+ stop->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
+
+ return stop;
}
static void
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 17:16 [PATCH 0/9] Various sched patches -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched: Remove cpu parameter for idle_balance() Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched: Fix race in idle_balance() Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 4/9] sched/fair: Track cgroup depth Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-28 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched: Push put_prev_task() into pick_next_task() bsegall
2014-01-28 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 6/9] sched/fair: Clean up __clear_buddies_* Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched/fair: Optimize cgroup pick_next_task_fair Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 12:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-30 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 8/9] sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 10:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-28 17:16 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched: Push down pre_schedule() and idle_balance() Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 12:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-30 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 18:07 ` [PATCH 0/9] Various sched patches -v2 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128171948.149077289@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox