From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755606AbaA1TPN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:15:13 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:34511 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755557AbaA1TPL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:15:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:14:59 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: bsegall@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, pjt@google.com, Steven Rostedt , Vincent Guittot Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] sched: Push put_prev_task() into pick_next_task() Message-ID: <20140128191459.GF11314@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20140128171634.974847076@infradead.org> <20140128171948.149077289@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:46:18AM -0800, bsegall@google.com wrote: > > @@ -4734,7 +4729,7 @@ static void migrate_tasks(unsigned int d > > if (rq->nr_running == 1) > > break; > > > > - next = pick_next_task(rq); > > + next = pick_next_task(rq, NULL); > > This seems to be incorrect without the if (prev) lines in > pick_next_task_foo, since foo_nr_running isn't enough to save us. ARgh, I knew there must've been a reason I had those :/