From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932640AbaAaR3Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:29:25 -0500 Received: from seldrel01.sonyericsson.com ([212.209.106.2]:18491 "EHLO seldrel01.sonyericsson.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932236AbaAaR3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:29:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:31:03 -0800 From: Courtney Cavin To: Georgi Djakov CC: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "pawel.moll@arm.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "galak@codeaurora.org" , "rob@landley.net" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "subhashj@codeaurora.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Initial support for MSM chipsets Message-ID: <20140131173102.GE19653@sonymobile.com> References: <1383753405-23631-1-git-send-email-gdjakov@mm-sol.com> <1383753405-23631-3-git-send-email-gdjakov@mm-sol.com> <20131209170002.GA15223@sonymobile.com> <52EA8A07.6080008@mm-sol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52EA8A07.6080008@mm-sol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 06:21:11PM +0100, Georgi Djakov wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies for the delayed reply. > > On 12/09/2013 07:00 PM, Courtney Cavin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:56:45PM +0100, Georgi Djakov wrote: > >> This platform driver adds the initial support of Secure > >> Digital Host Controller Interface compliant controller > >> found in Qualcomm MSM chipsets. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov [...] > > > > I couldn't get v6 running without the 5 quirks you submitted in [1]. > > Aren't these also attributes of the controller itself? If so, shouldn't they > > be part of this patch series, and included here? > > > > Most of the quirks are for older hardware revisions. On what board/chip > are you trying to run it? I will post v8 shortly. Could you try with it > please? I see. This was initially checked on a Rev 1 SoC. I will test v8 on a Rev 2. -Courtney