From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752721AbaBCLCL (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:02:11 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com ([74.125.82.171]:48664 "EHLO mail-we0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751711AbaBCLCI (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:02:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:02:01 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Linus Walleij Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Torokhov , Linux Input , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] mfd: tc3589x: Reform device tree probing Message-ID: <20140203110201.GV13529@lee--X1> References: <1390481008-23900-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20140123133141.GD8586@lee--X1> <20140123151123.GE8586@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> > Patch looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should rush this in > >> > for v3.14, or is it okay to go to -next? > >> > >> No rush, but it's been on review like forever so unless there is > >> some noise from the DT people at -rc1 I'd be very happy if you > >> could apply patches 1 & 2 by then. > > > > I'm just waiting for their Ack. If I don't have it soon I'll review it > > myself and any changes will have to come in via subsequent patch > > submissions. > > > > I think it's sensible to head for v3.15 for this set. > > So now that v3.14-rc1 is out can we queue this stuff? Queued. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog