From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Nathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] epoll: read(),write(),ioctl() interface
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:51:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140203215151.GA25594@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXBRW=x9myjxzZB+ChtPiH9zjNOd=YLtCp61ib3bqEpKA@mail.gmail.com>
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> >> On 02/02/2014 06:17 PM, Nathaniel Yazdani wrote:
> > So are you saying that those features you mentioned are specifically sought
> > after for the kernel? If so I'd like to take a crack at some of them,
> > may as well
> > get some use out of my new knowledge of epoll internals :)
>
> If by "sought after", you mean "is there at least one epoll user who
> wants them", then yes :)
>
> I think that EPOLLET and EPOLLONESHOT are giant hacks, and that what
> everyone really wants is the ability to very efficiently toggle events
> on and off. The ability to do it simultaneously and inexpensively
> with epoll_wait would make it happen.
Everybody using single-threaded epoll, you mean? I suppose there's
quite a few of those.
I've pondered an epoll_xchg syscall which would behave like *BSD kevent
to satisfy single-threaded users, but never got around to it. All my
epoll uses are multithreaded w/ oneshot nowadays, so xchg would only
save one syscall per thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-03 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 2:17 [RFC PATCH 0/3] epoll: read(),write(),ioctl() interface Nathaniel Yazdani
2014-02-03 2:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] epoll: reserve small ioctl() space Nathaniel Yazdani
2014-02-03 2:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] epoll: add struct epoll & ioctl() commands Nathaniel Yazdani
2014-02-03 2:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] epoll: add read()/write()/ioctl() operations Nathaniel Yazdani
2014-02-03 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] epoll: read(),write(),ioctl() interface Clemens Ladisch
2014-02-03 19:34 ` Nathaniel Yazdani
2014-02-03 19:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-03 19:42 ` Nathaniel Yazdani
2014-02-03 19:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-03 21:51 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2014-02-03 22:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-03 0:30 Nathaniel Yazdani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140203215151.GA25594@dcvr.yhbt.net \
--to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox