From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, tsc: Add missing Baytrail frequency to the table
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:28:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140204132831.GA18029@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140129214754.GA102071@bin.fm.intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:47:54PM -0800, Bin Gao wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:04:07PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Actually it does not work. I had the fallback path still in the patch when
> > I tried.
>
> Let's merge the ptach v2 then(continue on msr calibration retuning 0).
> All supported SoCs now have the correct frequency ID coding
> so continuing on non-PIC SoCs has very very small possibility.
x86 maintainers, any comments on this patch (v2)? Without the patch some
Baytrail systems fail to boot 3.14-rc1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 11:04 [PATCH] x86, tsc: Add missing Baytrail frequency to the table Mika Westerberg
2014-01-23 15:09 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-01-23 15:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-23 15:35 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-24 8:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <4460FA1017EA3844B646E90DA4E984057D5A4E9F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
2014-01-25 9:09 ` Bin Gao
2014-01-27 10:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-28 12:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-29 21:47 ` Bin Gao
2014-02-04 13:28 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2014-02-06 5:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, tsc: Fallback to normal calibration if fast MSR calibration fails Mika Westerberg
2014-02-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86, tsc: Add missing Baytrail frequency to the table Mika Westerberg
2014-02-06 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, tsc: Fallback to normal calibration if fast MSR calibration fails Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 15:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-02-09 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140204132831.GA18029@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bin.gao@intel.com \
--cc=bin.gao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).