Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/133] 3.12.10-stable review

Guenter Roeck
2014-02-05T21:05:45Z

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:41:48PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 11:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On 02/04/2014 01:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.10 release.
> >>There are 133 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>let me know.
> >>
> >>Responses should be made by Thu Feb 6 21:07:17 UTC 2014.
> >>Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >
> >
> >Version tested: v3.12.9-132
> >
> >Build results:
> > total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0
> >
> >qemu tests all passed.
> >
> >Results are as expected.
> >
> >Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> >
> >Guenter
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
>
> Patch applied cleanly. boot tests passed on all test systems. No
> dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions
> in warn.
>
> Minor Note: git apply --index complained about extra white space at
> the end of patch file. patch -p1 worked just fine.
>
I noticed. Usually that is a problem with the original patch,
and Greg (rightfully) doesn't modify it just to avoid such messages.

Guenter