From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Prepare removal of previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:41:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140206144321.608754481@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140206144127.181568017@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0003-x86-Prepare-removal-of-previous_esp-from-i386-thread.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5720 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
The i386 thread_info contains a previous_esp field that is used
to daisy chain the different stacks for dump_stack()
(ie. irq, softirq, thread stacks).
The goal is to eventual make i386 handling of thread_info the same
as x86_64, which means that the thread_info will not be in the stack
but as a per_cpu variable. We will no longer depend on thread_info
being able to daisy chain different stacks as it will only exist
in one location (the thread stack).
By moving previous_esp to the end of thread_info and referencing
it as an offset instead of using a thread_info field, this becomes
a stepping stone to moving the thread_info.
The offset to get to the previous stack is rather ugly in this
patch, but this is only temporary and the prev_esp will be changed
in the next commit. This commit is more for sanity checks of the
change.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110806012353.891757693@goodmis.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 7 ++++---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 11 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c | 15 +++++++++++----
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index ee029e4..ed96e37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -32,13 +32,14 @@ struct thread_info {
mm_segment_t addr_limit;
struct restart_block restart_block;
void __user *sysenter_return;
+ unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
+ unsigned int uaccess_err:1; /* uaccess failed */
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
unsigned long previous_esp; /* ESP of the previous stack in
case of nested (IRQ) stacks
+ (Moved to end, to be removed soon)
*/
-#endif
- unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
- unsigned int uaccess_err:1; /* uaccess failed */
+#endif
};
#define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index f2a1770..187d6a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
{
int graph = 0;
+ u32 *prev_esp;
if (!task)
task = current;
@@ -44,9 +45,17 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
((unsigned long)stack & (~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)));
bp = ops->walk_stack(context, stack, bp, ops, data, NULL, &graph);
- stack = (unsigned long *)context->previous_esp;
+ /* Stop if not on irq stack */
+ if (task_stack_page(task) == context)
+ break;
+
+ /* The previous esp is just above the context */
+ prev_esp = (u32 *) ((char *)context + sizeof(struct thread_info) -
+ sizeof(long));
+ stack = (unsigned long *)*prev_esp;
if (!stack)
break;
+
if (ops->stack(data, "IRQ") < 0)
break;
touch_nmi_watchdog();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
index d7fcbed..f135cc2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline int
execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
{
union irq_ctx *curctx, *irqctx;
- u32 *isp, arg1, arg2;
+ u32 *isp, *prev_esp, arg1, arg2;
curctx = (union irq_ctx *) current_thread_info();
irqctx = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_ctx);
@@ -98,7 +98,10 @@ execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
/* build the stack frame on the IRQ stack */
isp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(*irqctx));
irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->tinfo.task;
- irqctx->tinfo.previous_esp = current_stack_pointer;
+ /* Save the next esp after thread_info */
+ prev_esp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(struct thread_info) -
+ sizeof(long));
+ *prev_esp = current_stack_pointer;
if (unlikely(overflow))
call_on_stack(print_stack_overflow, isp);
@@ -149,16 +152,20 @@ void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
{
struct thread_info *curctx;
union irq_ctx *irqctx;
- u32 *isp;
+ u32 *isp, *prev_esp;
curctx = current_thread_info();
irqctx = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctx);
irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->task;
- irqctx->tinfo.previous_esp = current_stack_pointer;
/* build the stack frame on the softirq stack */
isp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(*irqctx));
+ /* Push the previous esp onto the stack */
+ prev_esp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(struct thread_info) -
+ sizeof(long));
+ *prev_esp = current_stack_pointer;
+
call_on_stack(__do_softirq, isp);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 7461f50..f352a7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long context = (unsigned long)regs & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1);
unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)®s->sp;
- struct thread_info *tinfo;
+ u32 *prev_esp;
if (context == (sp & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)))
return sp;
- tinfo = (struct thread_info *)context;
- if (tinfo->previous_esp)
- return tinfo->previous_esp;
+ prev_esp = (u32 *)(context + sizeof(struct thread_info) - sizeof(long));
+ if (prev_esp)
+ return (unsigned long)prev_esp;
return (unsigned long)regs;
}
--
1.8.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 14:41 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thead_info (again) Steven Rostedt
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Nuke the supervisor_stack field in i386 thread_info Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:00 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Nuke GET_THREAD_INFO_WITH_ESP() macro for i386 Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:00 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)
2014-02-06 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-03-07 1:01 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] x86: Prepare removal of previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32 Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:01 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 7:52 ` [PATCH] x86: redo "x86: Use inline assembler to get sp" Mathias Krause
2014-03-11 0:36 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] x86, threadinfo: Redo " tip-bot for Mathias Krause
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Clean up dumpstack_64.c code Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:01 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-02-28 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thead_info (again) Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-06 1:11 [PATCH 0/4 v2] [GIT PULL][v3.2] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thread_info Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] x86: Nuke the supervisor_stack field in i386 thread_info Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] x86: Remove previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32 Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] x86: Clean up dumpstack_64.c code Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 2:04 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] [GIT PULL][v3.2] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thread_info H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-08 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-19 2:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-19 5:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140206144321.608754481@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox