From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207011827.GA4735@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140130132630.GB6031@infradead.org>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 05:26:30AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Witch to using a preallocated flush_rq for blk-mq similar to what's done
> with the old request path. This allows us to set up the request properly
> with a tag from the actually allowed range and ->rq_disk as needed by
> some drivers. To make life easier we also switch to dynamic allocation
> of ->flush_rq for the old path.
>
> This effectively reverts most of
>
> "blk-mq: fix for flush deadlock"
>
> and
>
> "blk-mq: Don't reserve a tag for flush request"
Reusing the tag for flush request is considered before. The problem is driver
need get a request from a tag, reusing tag breaks this. The possible solution
is we provide a blk_mq_tag_to_request, and force driver uses it. And in this
function, if tag equals to flush_rq tag, we return flush_request.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 13:26 [PATCH 0/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-07 1:18 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2014-02-07 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 0:55 ` Shaohua Li
2014-02-10 10:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-07 20:45 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-03-08 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-08 17:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-08 19:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-08 18:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-08 21:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-08 22:09 ` [PATCH] block: fix q->flush_rq NULL pointer crash on dm-mpath flush Mike Snitzer
2014-03-09 0:24 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-09 0:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-09 3:18 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-09 3:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-12 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-12 10:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-12 10:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-12 11:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-12 11:00 ` SuSE O_DIRECT|O_NONBLOCK overload Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-13 0:15 ` NeilBrown
2014-03-14 17:46 ` Mike Christie
2014-03-13 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq Mike Snitzer
2014-03-14 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 9:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-14 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 9:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-14 10:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 11:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-14 13:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-14 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 14:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-15 13:28 ` scsi_debug and mutipath, was " Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-17 11:55 ` [dm-devel] " Bryn M. Reeves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140207011827.GA4735@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).