Re: [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction

Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07T21:06:49Z

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:20:44PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> > You don't return to this concern in the following mails of the thread:
> > did you later decide that it actually won't be a problem? I'll assume
> > so for the moment, since you took the patch, but please reassure me.
>
> I was just worrying about a different solution where we take
> css_offline invocation outside of cgroup_mutex and bumping up
> max_active. There's nothing to worry about your patch. Sorry about
> not being clear. :)

Thanks a lot for your detailed and admirably responsive explanations.
You were looking ahead, I see that now, and I'm gratefully reassured :)

Hugh