public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: move SRCU grace period work to power efficient workqueue
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:47:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210184729.GL4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F8A51F.4090909@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:08:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thank you all, queued for 3.15.

We should also have some facility for moving the SRCU workqueues to
housekeeping/timekeeping kthreads in the NO_HZ_FULL case.  Or does
this patch already have that effect?

							Thanx, Paul

> On 02/01/2014 03:53 AM, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> > From: Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com>
> > 
> > For better use of CPU idle time, allow the scheduler to select the CPU
> > on which the SRCU grace period work would be scheduled. This improves
> > idle residency time and conserves power.
> > 
> > This functionality is enabled when CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT is selected.
> > 
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com>
> > [zoran.markovic@linaro.org: Rebased to latest kernel version. Added commit
> > message. Fixed code alignment.]
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/srcu.c |    5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcu.c b/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
> > index 3318d82..a1ebe6d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
> > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head *head,
> >  	rcu_batch_queue(&sp->batch_queue, head);
> >  	if (!sp->running) {
> >  		sp->running = true;
> > -		schedule_delayed_work(&sp->work, 0);
> > +		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sp->work, 0);
> >  	}
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->queue_lock, flags);
> >  }
> > @@ -674,7 +674,8 @@ static void srcu_reschedule(struct srcu_struct *sp)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (pending)
> > -		schedule_delayed_work(&sp->work, SRCU_INTERVAL);
> > +		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> > +				   &sp->work, SRCU_INTERVAL);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-31 19:53 [RFC PATCH] rcu: move SRCU grace period work to power efficient workqueue Zoran Markovic
2014-01-31 20:10 ` Zoran Markovic
2014-02-10 10:08 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-02-10 18:47   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-02-12 18:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-12 19:02       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-12 19:23         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 19:59           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-12 20:13             ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 23:04             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-13  0:33               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-13  1:30                 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-02-13 14:05                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-14 23:24           ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-15  7:36             ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-16 16:41               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17  4:50                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-19  7:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-24 17:55                   ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-24 18:25                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-27 15:08             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-10  9:52             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-17  5:26       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-27 14:43         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-27 15:22           ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140210184729.GL4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zoran.markovic@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox