From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jslaby@suse.cz,
ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:14:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214001436.GA16287@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140214000717.GG30257@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:07:17AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:26:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 06:42:49PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > We went through this before, and I stated the paths, and no one disagreed
> > > with that.
> > >
> > > It /is/ racy.
> >
> > Ok, I just went and looked at the uart driver register path, and I don't
> > see the race (note, if there is one, it's there today, regardless of
> > this patch).
>
> The race isn't the uart code, it's the driver model.
>
> Consider what happens when this happens:
>
> * Two pl011 devices get registered at the same time by two different
> threads.
How? What two different busses will see this same device? The amba bus
code should prevent that from happening, right? If not, there's bigger
problems in that bus code :)
That's where this problem should be fixed, if there is one, otherwise
this same issue would be there for any type of driver that calles into
the uart core, right?
> * Both devices have a lock taken on the _device_ itself before matching
> against the driver.
>
> * Both devices get matched to the same driver.
>
> * Both devices are passed into the driver's probe function.
>
> * Both check uart_reg.state, both call uart_register_driver() on that
> at the same time, which results in two allocations inside
> uart_register_driver(), one gets overwritten...
>
> So, the /only/ thing which stops this happening is that the devices
> are generally available before the driver is registered, and driver
> registration results in devices being probed serially. Moreover, both
> attempt to call tty_register_driver()... one succeeds, the other fails.
>
> However, what about the userspace bind/unbind methods. Yes, userspace
> can ask the driver core to unbind devices from a driver or bind - and
> again, there's no per-driver locking here. So, if you can trigger two
> concurrent binds from userspace, you hit the same race as above.
>
> So, if you want to accept these patches, go ahead, introduce races, but
> personally I'd recommend plugging these races.
The only way to solve this would be to do it in the bus, I don't see
anything here that makes it any "racier" than it currently is.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 9:02 [PATCH 0/2] serial: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: " Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 10:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 11:53 ` Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 12:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 21:43 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-20 23:14 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-20 23:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:35 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-20 23:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-20 23:47 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-21 0:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-21 9:03 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-21 9:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <50b66ac6-1150-4ad7-aeaf-3d0dce77334d@email.android.com>
2014-01-26 11:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 4:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 10:07 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-27 12:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 15:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-21 16:59 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-21 18:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-23 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-23 18:40 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-23 18:47 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-23 19:36 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-23 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-23 20:05 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-23 21:33 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-24 12:03 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-24 14:38 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-27 0:15 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-27 0:04 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-20 21:16 ` Greg KH
2014-01-20 21:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:11 ` Greg KH
2014-01-20 23:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:51 ` Greg KH
2014-01-21 0:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-21 0:26 ` Greg KH
2014-01-21 0:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-21 9:25 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: " Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-13 18:12 ` Greg KH
2014-02-13 18:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-13 18:27 ` Greg KH
2014-02-13 18:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-13 23:26 ` Greg KH
2014-02-14 0:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-14 0:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-02-14 0:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-17 15:35 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-17 15:54 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-17 23:50 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-18 10:09 ` Etched Pixels
2014-02-19 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19 14:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-19 15:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19 0:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140214001436.GA16287@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox