From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752899AbaBQJK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:10:58 -0500 Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.112]:58705 "EHLO e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbaBQJK0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:10:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:10:21 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Paul Bolle Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: remove HAVE_MARCH_Z9?0_FEATURES Message-ID: <20140217091021.GB4651@osiris> References: <1392570927.28866.12.camel@x220> <20140217082035.GA4651@osiris> <1392627040.10966.18.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1392627040.10966.18.camel@x220> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14021709-3548-0000-0000-000008182C4D Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:50:40AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 09:20 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > No, I want to keep them, so there is a config symbol for each cpu generation > > and we don't have to add the config symbols again, if we actually use them. > > Yes, that's the idea: only add Kconfig symbols that you are actually > going to use. > > > It's a question of completeness in this case, not if they are being used. > > Completeness of what? Each cpu generation we support is supposed to have a "HAVE_MARCH__FEATURES" config symbol. > Anyhow, perhaps you can comment this stuff out if you want to have it in > the tree. See, these symbols will pop up each time that people run their > scripts to discover problems in the kconfig space. I suppose this was > probably not the first time these two were reported. And people not > aware of this thread might do that again, and again... What script did you use?