From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Optimize RCU_FAST_NO_HZ for RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:54:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140217215443.GG7941@thin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392673227-7066-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 01:40:27PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> If CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y, then no CPU will ever have RCU callbacks
> because these callbacks will instead be handled by the rcuo kthreads.
> However, the current version of RCU_FAST_NO_HZ nevertheless checks for RCU
> callbacks. This commit therefore creates static inline implementations
> of rcu_prepare_for_idle() and rcu_cleanup_after_idle() that are no-ops
> when CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y.
"creates static inline implementations" isn't quite accurate; they're
static, and in the header, and the compiler is likely to inline the
no-op versions, but they're not actually marked as inline. The commit
message should just say that it turns the implementations into no-ops.
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 820b06aefbee..41afc3fbfb6c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ extern int tick_nohz_active;
> * only if it has been awhile since the last time we did so. Afterwards,
> * if there are any callbacks ready for immediate invocation, return true.
> */
> -static bool rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(void)
> +static bool __maybe_unused rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(void)
> {
> bool cbs_ready = false;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> @@ -1743,6 +1743,7 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *dj)
> */
> static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
> {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> struct rcu_node *rnp;
> @@ -1794,6 +1795,7 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
> rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
> raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
> }
> +#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1803,11 +1805,12 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
> */
> static void rcu_cleanup_after_idle(int cpu)
> {
> -
> +#ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
> if (rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu))
> return;
> if (rcu_try_advance_all_cbs())
> invoke_rcu_core();
> +#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-17 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 21:40 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Response-time changes for 3.15 Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_is_nocb_cpu() for RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_needs_cpu() " Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:53 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-17 21:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Optimize RCU_FAST_NO_HZ " Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:54 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2014-02-17 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_is_nocb_cpu() " Josh Triplett
2014-02-17 23:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140217215443.GG7941@thin \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).