From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754797AbaBUJ4O (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:56:14 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:52264 "EHLO mail-bk0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754391AbaBUJ4K (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:56:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:56:07 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: David Herrmann Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Vetter , linux-kernel , Tomi Valkeinen , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] SimpleDRM & Sysfb Message-ID: <20140221095604.GI22574@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1390486503-1504-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WR+jf/RUebEcofwt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --WR+jf/RUebEcofwt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:18:51PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi >=20 > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:14 PM, David Herrmann w= rote: > > Hi > > > > Another round of SimpleDRM patches. I somehow lost track of the last on= es and as > > this is a major rewrite, I'll just start at v1 again. > > > > Some comments up-front: > > > > - @Ingo: Patch #1 and #2 are unchanged from the previous ML discussion= s. I > > included them in this series as the other patches depend on them. Co= uld you > > pick them up for the x86 tree? The other 9 patches won't make it in = 3.14 so > > no reason to put them through the DRM tree. > > All mentioned issues should be addressed. If there's still sth missi= ng, > > please let me know. > > > > - The DRM patches depend on my "DRM Anonymous Inode" patches. But it s= hould be > > trivial to apply them on drm-next (I think only one line needs to be= changed: > > i_mapping =3D> dev_mapping). > > > > - I tested the SimpleDRM fbdev fallback with linux-console+Xorg and it= works > > fine. The DRM backend is only tested with some DRM tests I have loca= lly. I > > have no idea how to make Xorg pick up a specific /dev/dri/card0 card= =2E It > > always tells me "no screens found" (as the underlying device is not = marked as > > boot_vga..). If someone knows how to tell Xorg to use card0, I'd gla= dly test > > this. But I'm no longer used to writing xorg.confs.. >=20 > For completeness, I tested this with Xorg+xf86-video-modesetting and > it works just fine. The xorg.conf I used can be found below. If this > driver gets upstreamed, I will try to make the X11 auto-loader detect > it just like any other platform-device. I recently posted patches[0] to the xorg-devel mailing list that I think should solve that issue. Thierry [0]: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2014-February/040568.html --WR+jf/RUebEcofwt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTByK0AAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhgesP/iVDOlFV9SkAv8OK1GY4dmfs cqOKH9TaKTBenMRgEb276Rm7nbdbRzmkM+GVjjhLQiYa5JTs9CGxcaulhWMFCrcf BeUkDBFnh8QRcMBBS6l+d1hZT9yNvSv85VqIfkdkEtwzIBznRo48gnhOdlq3AMyl l2f/hkUkDzImIRdZZpawk5NIZqqb5FWNjUL7p9Hn8q1jN89J3RvL8Gaagaa0XTJK ccCfHQR36AbLC8PlO1B4Ovc909clsWRelzWm+615lNBBMm+GCGhzGDCGHzsJ+r7G HWMsy73ORiemlDm2/dYvKAqcYy+UULm3foeIBqiBQDF9Fd7eJFtOcTDeTaI4HN+O XQsvRnlxNbLC8r6f1odpqnl373dEnEnqNSCe8nkEkC8UgERTy7+ZOzUKR4F9BgkQ U0LJRM4fS7BpkrhjxJR9JhrI7gCKimRhwItQXNYxr34BKdJxxQr8t53hxKJscFNj 5WxGW1S/r4TvOdFbShdu+nSE72TuzLzI7ew3kCB9gC45JbNgcZ4ahfNiX1OJPJso tNZSiVL76pWVNnplfIeOny8j6gk2cwZnk/yZrUDot/RQiMom8fHFOSpt4fW9zgHB 5Pu73hj8EkUAUSrX6AtbS2NgRqFY7X5PGEsTb0otxHESFeA0r5rsls79KBQxkqe/ UNkQwLbcE+Tuv/+WVmfj =gS6g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WR+jf/RUebEcofwt--