From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: x86_pmu_start WARN_ON.
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140221150312.GF3104@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140220182300.GN9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:23:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is I think the relevant bit:
>
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926153: x86_pmu_disable: x86_pmu_disable
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926153: x86_pmu_state: Events: {
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926156: x86_pmu_state: 0: state: .R config: ffffffffffffffff ( (null))
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926158: x86_pmu_state: 33: state: AR config: 0 (ffff88011ac99800)
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926159: x86_pmu_state: }
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926160: x86_pmu_state: n_events: 1, n_added: 0, n_txn: 1
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926161: x86_pmu_state: Assignment: {
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926162: x86_pmu_state: 0->33 tag: 1 config: 0 (ffff88011ac99800)
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926163: x86_pmu_state: }
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926166: collect_events: Adding event: 1 (ffff880119ec8800)
So we add the insn:p event (fd[23])
At this point we should have:
n_events = 2, n_added = 1, n_txn = 1
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926170: collect_events: Adding event: 0 (ffff8800c9e01800)
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926172: collect_events: Adding event: 4 (ffff8800cbab2c00)
We try and add the {BP,cycles,br_insn} group (fd[3], fd[4], fd[15]).
These events are 0:cycles and 4:br_insn, the BP event isn't x86_pmu so
that's not visible.
group_sched_in()
pmu->start_txn() /* nop - BP pmu */
event_sched_in()
event->pmu->add()
So here we should end up with:
0: n_events = 3, n_added = 2, n_txn = 2
4: n_events = 4, n_added = 3, n_txn = 3
But seeing the below state on x86_pmu_enable(), the must have failed,
because the 0 and 4 events aren't there anymore.
Looking at group_sched_in(), since the BP is the leader, its
event_sched_in() must have succeeded, for otherwise we would not have
seen the sibling adds.
But since neither 0 or 4 are in the below state; their event_sched_in()
must have failed; but I don't see why, the complete state: 0,0,1:p,4
fits perfectly fine on a core2.
However, since we try and schedule 4 it means the 0 event must have
succeeded! Therefore the 4 event must have failed, its failure will
have put group_sched_in() into the fail path, which will call:
event_sched_out()
event->pmu->del()
on 0 and the BP event.
Now x86_pmu_del() will reduce n_events; but it will not reduce n_added;
giving what we see below:
n_event = 2, n_added = 2, n_txn = 2
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926177: x86_pmu_enable: x86_pmu_enable
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926177: x86_pmu_state: Events: {
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926179: x86_pmu_state: 0: state: .R config: ffffffffffffffff ( (null))
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926181: x86_pmu_state: 33: state: AR config: 0 (ffff88011ac99800)
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926182: x86_pmu_state: }
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926184: x86_pmu_state: n_events: 2, n_added: 2, n_txn: 2
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926184: x86_pmu_state: Assignment: {
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926186: x86_pmu_state: 0->33 tag: 1 config: 0 (ffff88011ac99800)
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926188: x86_pmu_state: 1->0 tag: 1 config: 1 (ffff880119ec8800)
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926188: x86_pmu_state: }
> pec_1076_warn-2804 [000] d... 147.926190: x86_pmu_enable: S0: hwc->idx: 33, hwc->last_cpu: 0, hwc->last_tag: 1 hwc->state: 0
So the problem is that x86_pmu_del(), when called from a
group_sched_in() that fails (for whatever reason), and without x86_pmu
TXN support (because the leader is !x86_pmu), will corrupt the n_added
state.
If this all is correct; the below ought to cure things.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 895604f2e916..79f9f848bee4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1192,6 +1192,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
for (i = 0; i < cpuc->n_events; i++) {
if (event == cpuc->event_list[i]) {
+ if (i >= cpuc->n_events - cpuc->n_added)
+ --cpuc->n_added;
+
if (x86_pmu.put_event_constraints)
x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 19:02 x86_pmu_start WARN_ON Dave Jones
2014-02-10 21:26 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-11 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 21:04 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-13 14:11 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-13 17:35 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-13 22:13 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-18 18:30 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-18 22:20 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-19 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-19 22:34 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-20 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-20 15:47 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-20 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-20 17:31 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-20 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-20 18:23 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-20 19:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-20 17:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 17:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-20 18:03 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-20 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-20 18:54 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-20 19:21 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-20 19:46 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-21 14:37 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-21 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-02-21 20:18 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-24 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26 5:59 ` Vince Weaver
2014-02-27 13:32 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Fix event scheduling tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140221150312.GF3104@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox