public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock
@ 2014-02-24  0:51 Daeseok Youn
  2014-02-24  8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daeseok Youn @ 2014-02-24  0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh; +Cc: ufimtseva, paul.gortmaker, devel, linux-kernel

>From 5e737e8211cd1f83488e484c088befc5feb755a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:17:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock

sparse says:
drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c:1080:28: warning:
 context imbalance in 'Handle1401Esc' - unexpected unlock

Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c b/drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c
index efc310c..8195eb9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c
@@ -1053,7 +1053,6 @@ static int Handle1401Esc(DEVICE_EXTENSION *pdx, char *pCh,
 				/*  This can never happen, really */
 				dev_err(&pdx->interface->dev,
 					"ERROR: DMA setup while transfer still waiting");
-				spin_unlock(&pdx->stagedLock);
 			} else {
 				if ((wTransType == TM_EXTTOHOST)
 				    || (wTransType == TM_EXTTO1401)) {
-- 
1.7.9.5

---

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock
  2014-02-24  0:51 [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock Daeseok Youn
@ 2014-02-24  8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
  2014-02-24  9:44   ` DaeSeok Youn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-02-24  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daeseok Youn; +Cc: gregkh, devel, paul.gortmaker, linux-kernel, ufimtseva

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:51:35AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> >From 5e737e8211cd1f83488e484c088befc5feb755a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:17:41 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock

Don't send this header.  We get everything from the email header.

> 
> sparse says:
> drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c:1080:28: warning:
>  context imbalance in 'Handle1401Esc' - unexpected unlock
> 

Your fix is correct, but the changelog is not good.  These messages in
Sparse are wrong over 80% of the time.  So when I see one in a commit
message I assume it is wrong.  Add some more explanation to say why you
removed the spin_unlock.

Also "redundant" means "unnecessary" but sort of implies that it is
harmless.  Say something like: "staging: ced401: fix double unlock bug".

regards,
dan carpenter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock
  2014-02-24  8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2014-02-24  9:44   ` DaeSeok Youn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: DaeSeok Youn @ 2014-02-24  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Greg KH, devel, paul.gortmaker, linux-kernel, Elena Ufimtseva

2014-02-24 17:06 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:51:35AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> >From 5e737e8211cd1f83488e484c088befc5feb755a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:17:41 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock
>
> Don't send this header.  We get everything from the email header.
Actually, I did attach a file which is output of "git format-patch"
with text mode. So this header was included in my e-mail.
I will remove this header and send patch again. And I don't send this
header again.

>
>>
>> sparse says:
>> drivers/staging/ced1401/usb1401.c:1080:28: warning:
>>  context imbalance in 'Handle1401Esc' - unexpected unlock
>>
>
> Your fix is correct, but the changelog is not good.  These messages in
> Sparse are wrong over 80% of the time.  So when I see one in a commit
> message I assume it is wrong.  Add some more explanation to say why you
> removed the spin_unlock.
You're right. I will add more explanation about this patch.

>
> Also "redundant" means "unnecessary" but sort of implies that it is
> harmless.  Say something like: "staging: ced401: fix double unlock bug".
Ok. fix my subject as your comment.

>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Thanks for your comment.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-24  9:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-24  0:51 [PATCH] staging: ced401: remove redundant spin_unlock Daeseok Youn
2014-02-24  8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-24  9:44   ` DaeSeok Youn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox