public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jim McDonough <jmcd@samba.org>,
	David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>,
	Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:43:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140225094306.63cccecb@corrin.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140225161156.GA27235@kroah.com>

On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
> > ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable
> > 3.2 kernel?
> 
> Why just 3.2?  What's wrong with all of the other kernels before 3.12
> that do not have this patch in it?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Yeah, you'd probably need to apply it to every stable kernel > 3.2 or
you'd technically have a regression. I've no real objection to putting
that fix in, but backporting to older kernels may not be trivial. There
have been other changes in this area over the years...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-25 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-25 15:24 Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround? Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-02-25 15:29 ` Steve French
2014-02-25 16:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-25 17:43   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-02-25 18:49     ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-03-04 19:46     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140225094306.63cccecb@corrin.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ddiss@samba.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jmcd@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox