From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753357AbaBYLj6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:39:58 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38846 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbaBYLj4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:39:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:39:53 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mark Rutland Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Will Deacon , Dave P Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Perf core cleanups for shared perf_event_contexts Message-ID: <20140225113953.GP9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1392054264-23570-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20140219134340.GB19774@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140219134340.GB19774@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:43:41PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > While you have concerns with the later patches in the series, do you > have any concerns with teh first three (as below), or would you be happy > to take them? I've taken 1 and 2. I can take 3 if you confirm and update its Changelog. Thanks!