Re: [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

>  
> -/**
> - * get_sd_load_idx - Obtain the load index for a given sched domain.
> - * @sd: The sched_domain whose load_idx is to be obtained.
> - * @idle: The idle status of the CPU for whose sd load_idx is obtained.
> - *
> - * Return: The load index.
> - */
> -static inline int get_sd_load_idx(struct sched_domain *sd,
> -					enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> -{
> -	int load_idx;
> -
> -	switch (idle) {
> -	case CPU_NOT_IDLE:
> -		load_idx = sd->busy_idx;
> -		break;
> -
> -	case CPU_NEWLY_IDLE:
> -		load_idx = sd->newidle_idx;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		load_idx = sd->idle_idx;
> -		break;
> -	}
> -
> -	return load_idx;
> -}
> -

Since the last caller to get_sd_load_idx(), does it make sense to remove
the function definition for get_sd_load_idx() in the previous patch itself?

Or

> @@ -5903,13 +5868,11 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
>  	struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
>  	struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
>  	struct sg_lb_stats tmp_sgs;
> -	int load_idx, prefer_sibling = 0;
> +	int prefer_sibling = 0;
>  
>  	if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
>  		prefer_sibling = 1;
>  
> -	load_idx = 0;
> -
>  	do {
>  		struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
>  		int local_group;


The single line change in the previous patch gets removed here so why
not club them.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju