From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
rientjes@google.com, riel@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com, athorlton@sgi.com
Subject: Re: + mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:31:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226153144.GA15527@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530E0306.7020601@de.ibm.com>
On 02/26, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> On 26/02/14 15:50, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > But perhaps qemu can be changed to avoid MADV_HUGEPAGE on s390 ?
> > Otherwise I'd suggest the change below.
> >
> > Oleg.
> >
> >
> > --- x/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ x/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -1968,8 +1968,6 @@ out:
> > int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long *vm_flags, int advice)
> > {
> > - struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > -
> > switch (advice) {
> > case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
> > /*
> > @@ -1977,8 +1975,16 @@ int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_stru
> > */
> > if (*vm_flags & (VM_HUGEPAGE | VM_NO_THP))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - if (mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * MADV_HUGEPAGE after PRCTL_THP_DISABLE is broken on s390 because
> > + * qemu blindly does madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) after s390_enable_sie().
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> > + if (vma->vm_mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Ifdefs are ugly but might be the only way of not breaking existing userspace.
Yes, agreed. but note that this code is already s390-specific, nobody
else puts VM_NOHUGEPAGE into ->def_flags (until this series of course).
> If we come up with a solution for THP in KVM host processes on s390, we can
> then remove that wart. We could even limit that hack to KVM only processes
> to retain Alex' prctl capability by checking mm_has_pgste
Yes, yes, I looked at mm->context.has_pgste too ;) But I wasn't sure
we can rely on it. Thanks.
> > +/*
> > + * MADV_HUGEPAGE after PRCTL_THP_DISABLE is broken on s390 because
> > + * qemu blindly does madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) after s390_enable_sie().
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> > + if ((vma->vm_mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) && mm_has_pgste(vma->vm_mm))
> > return -EINVAL;
Hmm... but why do we need to check VM_NOHUGEPAGE then? Can't the
change below work?
Oleg.
--- x/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
+++ x/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -1084,7 +1084,6 @@ static inline void thp_split_mm(struct m
vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_HUGEPAGE;
vma->vm_flags |= VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
}
- mm->def_flags |= VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
}
#else
static inline void thp_split_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
--- x/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ x/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1968,8 +1968,6 @@ out:
int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long *vm_flags, int advice)
{
- struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
-
switch (advice) {
case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
/*
@@ -1977,8 +1975,12 @@ int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_stru
*/
if (*vm_flags & (VM_HUGEPAGE | VM_NO_THP))
return -EINVAL;
- if (mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_S390
+ if (mm_has_pgste(vma->vm_mm))
return -EINVAL;
+#endif
+
*vm_flags &= ~VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
*vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <530d2ce9.eikv0ULecNwxF4I5%akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <530D9F50.1080400@de.ibm.com>
2014-02-26 14:50 ` + mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-26 15:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-02-26 15:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-02-26 15:31 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-02-26 16:55 ` Gerald Schaefer
2014-02-26 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26 17:22 ` Alex Thorlton
2014-02-26 18:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-26 19:05 ` Gerald Schaefer
2014-02-27 16:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-26 19:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-02-26 19:39 ` Alex Thorlton
2014-02-26 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 0:01 ` Alex Thorlton
2014-02-27 17:26 ` Alex Thorlton
2014-02-26 20:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-27 16:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-26 18:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140226153144.GA15527@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox