From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: kvm: rate-limit global clock updates
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:25:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226202526.GA9218@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393438512-21273-2-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:15:11PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> When we update a vcpu's local clock it may pick up an NTP correction.
> We can't wait an indeterminate amount of time for other vcpus to pick
> up that correction, so commit 0061d53daf26f introduced a global clock
> update. However, we can't request a global clock update on every vcpu
> load either (which is what happens if the tsc is marked as unstable).
> The solution is to rate-limit the global clock updates. Marcelo
> calculated that we should delay the global clock updates no more
> than 0.1s as follows:
>
> Assume an NTP correction c is applied to one vcpu, but not the other,
> then in n seconds the delta of the vcpu system_timestamps will be
> c * n. If we assume a correction of 500ppm (worst-case), then the two
> vcpus will diverge 100us in 0.1s, which is a considerable amount.
100us -> 50us.
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e714f8c08ccf2..9aa09d330a4b5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> bool use_master_clock;
> u64 master_kernel_ns;
> cycle_t master_cycle_now;
> + struct delayed_work kvmclock_update_work;
>
> struct kvm_xen_hvm_config xen_hvm_config;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4cca45853dfeb..a2d30de597b7d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1628,20 +1628,43 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> * the others.
> *
> * So in those cases, request a kvmclock update for all vcpus.
> - * The worst case for a remote vcpu to update its kvmclock
> - * is then bounded by maximum nohz sleep latency.
> + * We need to rate-limit these requests though, as they can
> + * considerably slow guests that have a large number of vcpus.
> + * The time for a remote vcpu to update its kvmclock is bound
> + * by the delay we use to rate-limit the updates.
> */
>
> -static void kvm_gen_kvmclock_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> +#define KVMCLOCK_UPDATE_DELAY msecs_to_jiffies(100)
> +
> +static void kvmclock_update_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> int i;
> - struct kvm *kvm = v->kvm;
> + struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
> + struct kvm_arch *ka = container_of(dwork, struct kvm_arch,
> + kvmclock_update_work);
> + struct kvm *kvm = container_of(ka, struct kvm, arch);
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> set_bit(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, &vcpu->requests);
> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> }
> + kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> +}
Can cancel_work_sync on vm shutdown instead of get/put kvm ?
(somewhat annoying for vm to not go down immediatelly).
> +static void kvm_schedule_kvmclock_update(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
> + schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work,
> + KVMCLOCK_UPDATE_DELAY);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_gen_kvmclock_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> +{
> + struct kvm *kvm = v->kvm;
> +
> + set_bit(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, &v->requests);
> + kvm_schedule_kvmclock_update(kvm);
> }
>
> static bool msr_mtrr_valid(unsigned msr)
> @@ -7019,6 +7042,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>
> pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy(kvm);
>
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work, kvmclock_update_fn);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 18:15 [PATCH 0/2] x86: kvm: global clock updates Andrew Jones
2014-02-26 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: kvm: rate-limit " Andrew Jones
2014-02-26 20:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2014-02-27 13:11 ` Andrew Jones
2014-02-26 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: kvm: introduce periodic " Andrew Jones
2014-02-26 20:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-02-27 14:12 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140226202526.GA9218@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox