From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752027AbaB0TRs (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:17:48 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:50200 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742AbaB0TRq (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:17:46 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v8.1 1/6] dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:16:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , arm@kernel.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Sachin Kamat References: <21117503.1c6iOkvYSr@phil> <201402251419.31151.arnd@arndb.de> <2574291.evU61mFTUd@phil> In-Reply-To: <2574291.evU61mFTUd@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <201402272016.23521.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:quarLeCoas2pFnQzo/iiCJwM43MEoOjoaI/t+Po/7WE rZJDvQipeY/7AojI9gEYuvjy3PVeVquSbYCCJ/qFYxwoDDnmKT 3evf/S2e3nSrZxFUnIy8Yw2JxjOX4Urf5+3uyHBbNCwPcvGRh8 p5mfl/vbu9hvn/VBNk7sI+gOMQSCgoHw9OZV9D7GSdqxWMdmsz zr8sDlE/DufFI+JiwJvk8uHDQTCVXE1wYUXMbRvzXtgwcKOQ6L pBngOImja1aqs4VLc28L+GtUtR9w4KXQZP69MOxfcPi4VfDvI4 ek/HY/14mTrnDSp6Z+4ZFizWnYpbYwDWm+G5N01Fo7z40jSDYO a8+olp265SXN7dwCe1/M= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being part > of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the sram. > > Therefore add the option to define reserved regions as subnodes of the > sram-node similar to defining reserved global memory regions. > > Originally > Suggested-by: Rob Herring > > Using subnodes for reserved regions > Suggested-by: Grant Likely > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > Tested-by: Ulrich Prinz Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann