From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"majianpeng" <majianpeng@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md / procfs: avoid Oops if md-mod removed while /proc/mdstat is being polled.
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:07:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228100757.7dbd3dae@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227135125.92a56ff656b3ca8d0b5d9029@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2200 bytes --]
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:51:25 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:34:43 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:58:07 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:24:45 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If poll or select is waiting on /proc/mdstat when md-mod is unloaded
> > > > an oops will ensure when the poll/select completes.
> > > >
> > > > This is because the wait_queue_head which is registered with poll_wait()
> > > > is local to the module and no longer exists when the poll completes and
> > > > detaches that wait_queue_head (in poll_free_wait -> remove_wait_queue).
> > > >
> > > > To fix this we need the wait_queue_head to have (at least) the same life
> > > > time as the proc_dir_entry. So this patch places it in that structure.
> > > >
> > > > We:
> > > > - add pde_poll_wait to struct proc_dir_entry
> > > > - call poll_wait() passing this when poll() is called on the proc file
> > > > - export a function proc_wake_up which will call wake_up() on pde_poll_wait
> > > >
> > > > and make use of all that in md.c
> > >
> > > This sounds wrong. If a userspace process is waiting on
> > > md_event_waiters then the md module is "busy" and the rmmod attempt
> > > should fail?
> >
> > Al Viro says "no" quite firmly.
> >
> > I think the core argument is that
> >
> > rmmod md-mod < /proc/mdstat
> >
> > would deadlock.
>
> Well, only if the rmmod hangs around waiting for the module to go idle.
> I'm thinking rmmod should fail. EBUSY.
>
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133024267507384
>
> Why don't a billion blocking-procfs-read sites have this problem?
>
This issue of a file in /proc (actually /proc/fs/nfsd which is a separate
filesystem) blocking came up on the NFS list recently.
Experiments suggested that no other files in /proc block reads
(though /proc/vmcore takes somewhat longer to 'cat' than most).
So the offending file was changed to never block.
i.e. I think your 'billion' estimate is a little high, by one billion.
:-)
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 6:24 [PATCH] md / procfs: avoid Oops if md-mod removed while /proc/mdstat is being polled NeilBrown
2014-02-27 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 21:34 ` NeilBrown
2014-02-27 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 23:07 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-02-27 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-03 3:53 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140228100757.7dbd3dae@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox