From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivercore: deferral race condition fix
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:33:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301003320.GA31852@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393398414-10822-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> When the kernel is built with CONFIG_PREEMPT it is possible to reach a state
> when all modules are loaded but some driver still stuck in the deferred list
> and there is a need for external event to kick the deferred queue to probe
> these drivers.
>
> The issue has been observed on embedded systems with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled,
> audio support built as modules and using nfsroot for root filesystem.
>
> The following fragment of a log shows such sequence when all audio modules
> were loaded but the sound card is not present since the machine driver has
> failed to probe due to missing dependency during it's probe.
> The board is am335x-evmsk (McASP<->tlv320aic3106 codec) with davinci-evm
> machine driver:
>
> ...
> [ 12.615118] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: davinci_mcasp_probe: ENTER
> [ 12.719969] davinci_evm sound.3: davinci_evm_probe: ENTER
> [ 12.725753] davinci_evm sound.3: davinci_evm_probe: snd_soc_register_card
> [ 12.753846] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: davinci_mcasp_probe: snd_soc_register_component
> [ 12.922051] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: davinci_mcasp_probe: snd_soc_register_component DONE
> [ 12.950839] davinci_evm sound.3: ASoC: platform (null) not registered
> [ 12.957898] davinci_evm sound.3: davinci_evm_probe: snd_soc_register_card DONE (-517)
> [ 13.099026] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: Kicking the deferred list
> [ 13.177838] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: really_probe: probe_count = 2
> [ 13.194130] davinci_evm sound.3: snd_soc_register_card failed (-517)
> [ 13.346755] davinci_mcasp_driver_init: LEAVE
> [ 13.377446] platform sound.3: Driver davinci_evm requests probe deferral
> [ 13.592527] platform sound.3: really_probe: probe_count = 0
>
> In the log the machine driver enters it's probe at 12.719969 (this point it
> has been removed from the deferred lists). McASP driver already executing
> it's probing (12.615118) and finishes first as well.
> The machine driver tries to construct the sound card (12.950839) but did
> not found one of the components so it fails. After this McASP driver
> registers all the ASoC components and the deferred work is prepared at
> 13.099026 (note that this time the machine driver is not in the lists so it
> is not going to be handled when the work is executing).
> Lastly the machine driver exit from it's probe and the core places it to the
> deferred list but there will be no other driver going to load and the
> deferred queue is not going to be kicked again - till we have external event
> like connecting USB stick, etc.
>
> The proposed solution is to try the deferred queue once more when the last
> driver is asking for deferring and we had drivers loaded while this last
> driver was probing.
"once more"? What happens if we get a new driver in when that one is
being probed?
It sounds like there's a race condition here somewhere, or improper
locking going on, just "let's try it again" doesn't sound like the
correct fix to me, does it to you?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-01 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 7:06 [PATCH] drivercore: deferral race condition fix Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-01 0:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-03-03 8:26 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-04 4:56 ` Mark Brown
2014-04-02 6:38 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-04-02 23:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-03 9:07 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140301003320.GA31852@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox