From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755533AbaCCXED (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:04:03 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:4179 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755016AbaCCXD6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:03:58 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,581,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="493447477" Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:01:48 -0800 From: "David E. Box" To: "Li, Aubrey" Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support Message-ID: <20140303230148.GA29215@linux.intel.com> References: <1393609674-2999-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <1393641652-7222-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <531428D9.1060101@linux.intel.com> <20140303155850.GA2879@linux.intel.com> <5314FEF3.70908@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5314FEF3.70908@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 06:15:15AM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2014/3/3 23:58, David E. Box wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's > >> the relationship between > >> arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c > >> and > >> drivers/platform/x86/intel_baytrail.c > >> > > iosf_mbi.c is the version that went upstream, no longer specific to baytrail. > > Then should we remove the latter? > Absolutely. I wasn't aware until now that this version went upstream. I didn't see a tip for it. I'll send a patch to revert it. david box