From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756878AbaCDKXe (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:23:34 -0500 Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:50249 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756721AbaCDKXd (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:23:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:23:16 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Graeme Gregory Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , "lenb@kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for arm64 acpi Message-ID: <20140304102316.GG30596@arm.com> References: <1393899345-7397-1-git-send-email-graeme.gregory@linaro.org> <1393899345-7397-2-git-send-email-graeme.gregory@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393899345-7397-2-git-send-email-graeme.gregory@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > +ACPI ARM64 That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support, architected peripherals, SoC? > +M: Hanjun Guo > +M: Graeme Gregory > +S: Supported > +L: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > +F: drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c This patch should be part of the series introducing the arm-core.c file and it will be ACKed (or NAKed) following review. We can't really commit maintainers to a file which does not exist in mainline and while there is still feedback to be addressed. It's like a blank cheque. -- Catalin