public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] xhci: Prevent runtime pm from autosuspending during initialization
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:04:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304170458.GA10789@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5315BE1F.8020100@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:50:55PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 08:37 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> >>xHCI driver has its own pci probe function that will call usb_hcd_pci_probe
> >>to register its usb-2 bus, and then continue to manually register the
> >>usb-3 bus. usb_hcd_pci_probe does a pm_runtime_put_noidle at the end and
> >>might thus trigger a runtime suspend before the usb-3 bus is ready.
> >
> >What is the result if that happens?
> 
> Crashes. Null pointer dereference in xhci_suspend() when touching
> xhci->shared_hcd before it's initialized. More info here:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138914518219334&w=2
> 
> >
> >Is this a regression from 3.13?  Or something new for 3.14?
> >
> 
> According to reporter its been around since 3.7
> 
> commit 596d789a211d134dc5f94d1e5957248c204ef850
> USB: set hub's default autosuspend delay as 0
> 
> But nobody else than the reporter is able to trigger it.

Then it can wait for 3.15-rc1, and then go back to the stable trees at
that time, right?  I'd prefer that as it's not a regression and not
common.

> >What platform(s) are affected by this?
> 
> David, the reporter (added to cc), mentioned
> "This bug happened in a platform with 1 usb3 host controller + 1 usb3 OTG
> controller" run by some Intel internal group
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138915969822029&w=2

That sounds like a "not shipping platform" to me :)

Please resend this with patches for 3.15-rc1.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-04 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-03 17:30 [PATCH 0/1] xhci: fixes for 3.14 Mathias Nyman
2014-03-03 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] xhci: Prevent runtime pm from autosuspending during initialization Mathias Nyman
     [not found]   ` <20140303183733.GA13926@kroah.com>
2014-03-04 11:50     ` Mathias Nyman
2014-03-04 17:04       ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-03-04 17:35         ` David Cohen
2014-03-04 22:44         ` Sarah Sharp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140304170458.GA10789@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox