Re: [PATCH 1/6] rtc: pm8xxx: fixup checkpatch/style issues

[Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 01:02:29PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/05/14 11:29, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > Before performing additional cleanups to this driver, do the easy
> > cleanups first.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Thanks for the reviews.

> > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
> >  
> >  	ctrl_reg = rtc_dd->ctrl_reg;
> >  	ctrl_reg = alarm->enabled ? (ctrl_reg | PM8xxx_RTC_ALARM_ENABLE) :
> > -					(ctrl_reg & ~PM8xxx_RTC_ALARM_ENABLE);
> > +				    (ctrl_reg & ~PM8xxx_RTC_ALARM_ENABLE);
> >  
> >  	rc = pm8xxx_write_wrapper(rtc_dd, &ctrl_reg, rtc_dd->rtc_base, 1);
> >  	if (rc < 0) {
> 
> This could be better style with more lines:
> 
> if (alarm->enabled)
>     ctrl_reg |= PM8xxx_RTC_ALARM_ENABLE;
> else
>     ctrl_reg &= ~PM8xxx_RTC_ALARM_ENABLE;

Agreed, I'll clean this up in a v2.

I might go back and see just how much can be cleanup up to use the
regmap_update_bits() API as well.

Thanks,
  Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation