From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753024AbaCGASS (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:18:18 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:62951 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752126AbaCGASQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:18:16 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Liviu Dudau Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 01:17:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "linux-pci" , Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "linaro-kernel" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , LKML , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , LAKML , Tanmay Inamdar References: <1393948216-11599-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <201403042328.51361.arnd@arndb.de> <20140306161713.GH6457@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140306161713.GH6457@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201403070117.47125.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:yjLtEat20V3HaEoXzXIn+yhN8B8mcJFyPqFfLsqZZjf oJZEl2UA76Vwg0pp/qE3vz40Q4E4CHjrrr2LE8VJO2BcnfbP7H 8TY/mXM1F+7tjt7UBrgrUzn35eksdyMa9ynEvNGrPqCi/ywtFd 6kzm9k5AqMDReafYiHJvrGDfca1eBZ81CpbDGsIdp1d5rHbyNT 9BslIU1BMfqunhSabqi0G3daRLeDhyMT8C7WIyVQvFDAGSXrJG pOr1uCrWcKiO9qRojcOrpTUbrXFnUms+NvG1McDCJcSwRf70Ev OxDTPTZuOm4sIPOyWrMVVGTMOGiYTYbskYooZ10toJfv9vDGyR 1zWzB027n+ddzZc3BhAnqP6glpUmqc9z7fi5ph9/1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:28:51PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > > +extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy; > > > > As commented before, I still think we can hardcode this to off > > Unfortunately that doesn't work when you have CONFIG_PCI=y. drivers/pci/pci.c has: > > drivers/pci/pci.c:int isa_dma_bridge_buggy; > drivers/pci/pci.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(isa_dma_bridge_buggy); > > and drivers/pci/quirks.c does: > > drivers/pci/quirks.c: if (!isa_dma_bridge_buggy) { > drivers/pci/quirks.c: isa_dma_bridge_buggy=1; > drivers/pci/quirks.c- dev_info(&dev->dev, "Activating ISA DMA hang workarounds\n"); > drivers/pci/quirks.c- } > Ah, I see. Should we maybe move the declaration to a more generic header file then? If the architectures cannot override it anyway, it shouldn't be up to the architecture to declare it. Arnd