Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] mfd: da9063: Upgrade of register definitions to support production silicon

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> 
> This patch updates the register definitions for DA9063 to support the
> production silicon variant code ID (0x5). These changes are not backwards
> compatible with the previous register definitions and can only be used
> with the production variant of DA9063.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> ---
> Checks performed with next-20140306/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>  registers.h               total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1032 lines checked
> 
> A brief summary of the changes include:
> 
> - Introduction of a new DA9063_REG_ALARM_S register (now appearing at
>   addr=0x46) allowing alarm second resolutions and which causes a shift
>   in the register map for the RTC registers;
> - Two new configuration registers DA9063_REG_CONFIG_M/N at 0x112 & 0x113;
> - Modified register ranges for MON_REG_[1-6] which now appears at the
>   addr=0x114 onwards;
> - New register addresses for the general purpose registers GP_ID_[0-19]
>   (now appearing at 0x121 onwards);
> - Renaming of some definitions to match our hardware design conventions;
> - There are also some bit-pattern additions that define some functionality
>   alterations of the registers. One notable addition is:
>   DA9063_BUCK_SLOWSTART can also be found in the CONTROL_B register and
>   enables a BUCK slow start (reduced inrush current; increased startup
>   time);
> 
> This patch applies against kernel version linux-next next-20140306
> 
>  include/linux/mfd/da9063/registers.h |  120 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

What's the difference between this patch and the one you sent 2 days
ago?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog