From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752226AbaCIHGu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Mar 2014 03:06:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:55046 "EHLO mail-ea0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751792AbaCIHGt (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Mar 2014 03:06:49 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:06:42 +0200 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda To: Jon Mason Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , WANG Chao , Thomas Gleixner , Vivek Goyal , Yinghai Lu , Baoquan He , kexec@lists.infradead.org, discuss@x86-64.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: How could we get rid of saved_max_pfn for calgary iommu? Message-ID: <20140309070642.GA2525@needle> References: <20140219061824.GA29703@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com> <20140305053617.GE26240@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com> <20140306064756.GB16859@needle.mulix.org> <53181AC1.2020807@zytor.com> <20140306070047.GF16859@needle.mulix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:46:44AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > > I don't know of anyone still using it, but it's not > > impossible. Calgary and CalIOC2 machines would now be ~5-8 years > > old. > > It is getting a bit crufty in arch/x86. Would it be better to move > it to drivers/iommu? Not sure I see the potential benefit... I think for Calgary it's either leave it in arch/x86 or rip it out. Cheers, Muli