From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755159AbaCKNI7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:08:59 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53185 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752183AbaCKNI6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:08:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:08:25 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , "mingo@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "fenghua.yu@intel.com" , "schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" , "james.hogan@imgtec.com" , "cmetcalf@tilera.com" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description Message-ID: <20140311130825.GX9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1394003906-11630-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <5317B092.7070805@arm.com> <53186A8A.9060406@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 10:47:49AM +0800, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Peter, > > Was the use of the cpu as a parameter in the initialization of > sched_domain's flag a reason for asking for reworking the > initialization of sched_domain ? /me tries very hard to remember.. and fails. Reading back the linked thread also doesn't seem to jog memory.