From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753490AbaCMJHZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:07:25 -0400
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:25786 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753192AbaCMJHW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:07:22 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,646,1389772800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="491114896"
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:06:54 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sched/balance] INFO: possible recursive locking detected
Message-ID: <20140313090654.GJ27627@localhost>
References: <20140303142526.GA8517@localhost>
 <5321618F.3090801@linaro.org>
 <20140313085341.GC27627@localhost>
 <5321739B.1000506@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5321739B.1000506@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 04:53 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 03:43:11PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> On 03/03/2014 10:25 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>> Greetings,
> >>>
> >>> I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git single-balance.bak
> >>> commit 2adc591a5cb6768ad11e63be9011906aa171148d
> >>> Author:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
> >>> AuthorDate: Fri Feb 28 15:25:09 2014 +0800
> >>> Commit:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
> >>> CommitDate: Sun Mar 2 09:16:38 2014 +0800
> >>>
> >>>     sched/balance: replace new_idle_balance
> >>>     
> >>>     Curren idle_balance will pull task on half of this group. That is
> >>>     not needed in central balance.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your testing, Fengguang!
> >>
> >> I fixed this issue and updated to the git tree. Is the single-balance
> >> branch still in your performance radar? :)
> > 
> > Sure, however you know it's costly to queue tests for one single tree.
> > If your trees are directly based on -rcX kernels, that would cut the
> > tests required for comparison by half.
> 
> Thanks a lot! I will keep in mind for this point.
> rebased on rc6 kernel for that branch. :)

That's great!

> Thanks again for generous help!

You are welcome. I've queued alexshi/single-balance for testing.

Thanks,
Fengguang