From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755945AbaCNJGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:06:54 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:28044 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755726AbaCNJGu (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:06:50 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,653,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="491818123" Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:06:44 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu To: Alex Shi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [sched/balance] INFO: possible recursive locking detected Message-ID: <20140314090644.GA19275@localhost> References: <20140303142526.GA8517@localhost> <5321618F.3090801@linaro.org> <20140313085341.GC27627@localhost> <5321739B.1000506@linaro.org> <20140314061643.GA28194@localhost> <5322A110.5030405@linaro.org> <20140314064853.GB29349@localhost> <5322B049.1040301@linaro.org> <20140314074009.GA6709@localhost> <5322C1F3.1020108@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5322C1F3.1020108@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 04:46:43PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > On 03/14/2014 03:40 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:31:21PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > >> On 03/14/2014 02:48 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:26:24PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > >>>> On 03/14/2014 02:16 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >>>>> Alex, > >>>>> > >>>>> Here are the test results for branch alexshi/single-balance > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks a lot! Fengguang. > >>>> Is the nex04 machine 4P*8 core * HT? and are a04/a06 atom box? > >>> > >>> nex04 is Nehalem-EX. a04/06 are Atom servers. > >>> > >>>> Would you like to share the machine info for nhm8, nhm-white and xps2? > >>> > >>> They are all 1S Nehalem PC. > >> > >> thanks for explanation! Are these all the machine launched in testing? > > > > All the tested cases are > > > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_RR > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_STREAM > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_STREAM_MANY > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_CRR > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_MAERTS > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_RR > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_SENDFILE > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM > > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_RR > > /lkp/result/lkp-a06/micro/qperf/600s > > /lkp/result/lkp-nex04/micro/ebizzy/200%-100-10 > > /lkp/result/nhm-white/sysbench/oltp/600s-100%-1000000 > > /lkp/result/nhm8/micro/dbench/100% > > /lkp/result/xps2/micro/pigz/100% > > > > Why not add hackbench and bigger machine? :) Yeah sure, but the machine that runs hackbench boot failed.. Thanks, Fengguang