From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754900AbaCNOij (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:38:39 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:16102 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754640AbaCNOih (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:38:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,655,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="491983337" Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:38:31 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Yoshihiro YUNOMAE , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Stephen Warren , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hidehiro Kawai , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Masami Hiramatsu , Aaron Sierra , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] serial/uart/8250: Add tunable RX interrupt trigger I/F of FIFO buffers Message-ID: <20140314143831.GB11603@xps8300> References: <20140314022154.4345.23024.stgit@yunodevel> <20140314120400.4e17c47a@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140314120400.4e17c47a@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:04:00PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > Otherwise this looks good to me. The interface is sensible, it can be > expanded easily to other devices and device types, and the logic looks > right. I have one concern.. I think this may be problematic when used with DMA. The burst size is usually expected to be aligned with the trigger level. Though I don't know how big risk that actually is. Thanks, -- heikki