From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751439AbaCPHJi (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:09:38 -0400 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:53667 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751024AbaCPHJh (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:09:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 04:09:17 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Sebastian Capella Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Len Brown , Russell King , Jonathan Austin , Victor Kamensky , Nicolas Pitre , Will Deacon , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Laura Abbott , Sricharan R , Ben Dooks , Russ Dill , Catalin Marinas , Santosh Shilimkar , Stephen Boyd , Stefano Stabellini , Jiang Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk Message-ID: <20140316070917.GA3094@arch.cereza> References: <1394016605-24120-1-git-send-email-sebastian.capella@linaro.org> <1394016605-24120-3-git-send-email-sebastian.capella@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1394016605-24120-3-git-send-email-sebastian.capella@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mar 05, Sebastian Capella wrote: [..] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig > index 1f8fed9..83707702 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig > @@ -611,6 +611,11 @@ config CPU_USE_DOMAINS > config IO_36 > bool > > +config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE > + bool > + depends on MMU > + default y if CPU_ARM920T || CPU_ARM926T || CPU_SA1100 || CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 > + > comment "Processor Features" > Is there any reason why CPU_FEROCEON is not listed here? FWIW, I've just built (but not really tested) a Kirkwood kernel with CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y. And is there any reason to put this config in arch/arm/mm/Kconfig, instead of in arch/arm/Kconfig, below ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE? I'm also puzzled about having two separate options for suspend and hibernate, maybe someone can explain me why a given CPU would support the former but not the latter? Thanks! -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com