linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tytso@mit.edu
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Frank Swiderski <fes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth the max supportable by the hypervisor
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:40:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317054053.GF14162@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87siqhu048.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:12:15AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> Note that with indirect descriptors (which is supported by Almost
> Everyone), we can actually use the full index, so this value is a bit
> pessimistic.  But it's OK as a starting point.

So is this something that can go upstream with perhaps a slight
adjustment in the commit description?  Do you think we need to be able
to dynamically adjust the queue depth after the module has been loaded
or the kernel has been booted?  If so, anyone a hint about the best
way to do that would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-17  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1394841445-16142-1-git-send-email-venkateshs@google.com>
2014-03-15  3:34 ` [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth the max supportable by the hypervisor Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-15 10:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-15 13:20     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-15 13:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-15 15:13     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-17  0:42   ` Rusty Russell
2014-03-17  5:40     ` tytso [this message]
2014-03-19  6:28       ` Rusty Russell
2014-03-19 17:48         ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-25 18:50           ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-31  3:52             ` Rusty Russell
2014-04-01  2:27               ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-01 10:49                 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-04-02  7:36                   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140317054053.GF14162@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=fes@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=venkateshs@google.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).