Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: wlags49_h2: Correct macro style in wl_netdev.c

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:20:34AM +0100, Mathieu Maret wrote:
> Multi statement macro should use do{}while(0)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Maret <mathieu.maret@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
> index 255d291..6455956 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
> @@ -107,9 +107,11 @@
>   * macros
>   ******************************************************************************/
>  #define BLOCK_INPUT(buf, len) \
> -    desc->buf_addr = buf; \
> -    desc->BUF_SIZE = len; \
> -    status = hcf_rcv_msg(&(lp->hcfCtx), desc, 0)
> +	do { \
> +		desc->buf_addr = buf; \
> +		desc->BUF_SIZE = len; \
> +		status = hcf_rcv_msg(&(lp->hcfCtx), desc, 0) \
> +	} while (0)
>  
>  #define BLOCK_INPUT_DMA(buf, len) memcpy( buf, desc_next->buf_addr, pktlen )
>  

You didn't test-build the code after making this change, as this patch
breaks the build into lots of tiny pieces :(

Please ALWAYS test your patches.

I've applied the first 3 patches, please fix this one up (if it's even
possible, hint, I don't think it is...) and resend the remaining
patches.

thanks,

greg k-h