From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759368AbaCSRRz (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:17:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:36975 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbaCSRRw (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:17:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:17:48 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Lee Jones Cc: Peter Tyser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Ralston , Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mfd: lpc_ich: Fix ACPI enable bitmask Message-ID: <20140319171748.GA3842@roeck-us.net> References: <1394487298-14459-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com> <20140313151601.GA4479@roeck-us.net> <20140313152534.GC10356@lee--X1> <20140313225040.GK28504@lee--X1> <53223964.2080408@roeck-us.net> <20140314102934.GA3432@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140314102934.GA3432@lee--X1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:29:34AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > >>>>The original bitmask of 0x10 was incorrect and would result in a write > > >>>>to a reserved read-only bit instead of enabling the ACPI I/O > > >>>>region. Update it to the proper value of 0x80. > > >>>> > > >>>>Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > > >>>>Tested-by: Rajat Jain > > >>>>Cc: Guenter Roeck > > >>>>Cc: James Ralston > > >>>>Cc: Samuel Ortiz > > >>>>Cc: Lee Jones > > >>> > > >>>Who is going to pick up this series ? > > >> > > >>I will, once I've completed the review. > > > > > >Okay review complete, phew! > > > > > >Guenter, How do you want to play this? Do you want me to create an > > >immutable branch for you to pull from? > > > > > > > I'll be happy if I can pull it from -next. Is it going to be there > > anytime soon ? > > Well I pushed an updated version of the MFD today, so it should appear > in -next this evening. > Hi Lee, for some reason I still don't see the patches in linux-next, even though I see them in your mfd-next branch. Any idea what is happening ? Is it possible that Stephen picks up a different mfd-next tree ? Thanks, Guenter