Re: [PATCH 00/33] [RFC] Non disruptive application core dump infrastructure

Phillip Susi
2014-03-21T15:03:06Z

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/21/2014 4:17 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> The gencore command looks like a good idea, but why we need the
> client-server infrastructure? At least at first glance it seems
> like overkill.

Yes, the server seems pointless.

>> We would like to push this to one of the following packages: a)
>> util-linux b) coreutils c) procps-ng
>
> d) somewhere near to gdb :-)

gdb already has such a thing; it's called gcore. Kind of makes this
work seem redundant?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTLFSjAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwuTIH/jGtc3dB1WKgtDSE2wtXXHO0
0WxhWDbVkpJ0Q+tkG/tjw4wudYtEJ+XAHsCIK3vH7OMX7i4PMOLDgjT/FyxTPrWl
W+eUCazi4vRPNGscii5mRFlsthgEd2pofotlx5UB7Br9D05/QZqErtEMJMqD935V
94wlvJSvJI0n3hfAUgcM8apxTgxYr/TIPEQPfqLem3xTZIw3lTRic613Qji2Kwif
l+kqs0WLy/AHEwBLRrXDQahnv5n2IhOVUn3KDwm9Su56rbrmAF7LAvK0+uxRyoQk
IVC5h8BdBQ4QMYl7KYYEPy+n+0Qbe1EQ4tLmYvaEBwXP5c0QDGX0M5VUkko+eGI=
=zFoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----