From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751431AbaCVTD4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:03:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:60154 "EHLO mail-ee0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750871AbaCVTDx (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:03:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:27:59 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov To: Peter Wu Cc: Venkatesh Srinivas , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Developers List , "H. Peter Anvin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: GPF in intel_pmu_lbr_reset() with qemu -cpu host Message-ID: <20140322122758.GA4292@minantech.com> References: <4055058.qLAukpngnj@al> <20140322085045.GA5535@minantech.com> <1558917.OgpeoK0IhF@al> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1558917.OgpeoK0IhF@al> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:05:03AM +0100, Peter Wu wrote: > On Saturday 22 March 2014 10:50:45 Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wu wrote: > > [skip] > > > > > When -cpu host is used, qemu/kvm passed the host CPUID F/M/S to the > > > guest. intel_pmu_cpu_*() -> intel_pmu_lbr_reset() uses rdmsr() / > > > wrmsr(), rather than the safe variants; if KVM does not support the > > > particular MSRs in question, you will see a #GP(0) there. See > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/13/453 for a similar bug other PMU code. > > > > > When kernel is compiled with guest support all rdmsr()/wrmsr() become _safe(), > > so the question for Peter is if his guest kernel has guest support enabled? > > Linux guest support (CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST) was not enabled, see > .config in the first mail[1]. Enabling that option does not change the > situation. > > With CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_KVM_GUEST enabled, the PMU GPF is gone, Yeah, it should be PARAVIRT indeed since rdmsr()/wrmsr() is substituted by _safe() using paravirt calls. > but now I have a NULL dereference (in rapl_pmu_init). Previously, when > `-cpu SandyBridge` was passed to qemu, it would show this: > > [ 0.016995] Performance Events: unsupported p6 CPU model 42 no PMU driver, software events only. > > The same NULL pointer deref would be visible (slightly different > addresses, but the Code lines are equal). With `-host`, the NULL deref > with `-cpu host` contains: > > [ 0.016445] Performance Events: 16-deep LBR, IvyBridge events, Intel PMU driver. > > Full dmesg below. > I am confused. Do you see crash now with -cpu SandyBridge and -cpu host, or -cpu host only? -- Gleb.