From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] workqueue: Add anon workqueue sysfs hierarchy
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:55:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140322185551.GA24945@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140322170114.GA20038@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:01:18PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 1) Call a per workqueue mutex when a work execute on an ordered workqueue. Although
> contention should be very rare (only while we replace the workqueue attrs and
> switch to a new worker), frequent locking may have a visible impact.
>
> 2) Have a seperate worker for all ordered workqueues. But we may lose a bit of
> serialization with other workqueues along the way.
Ordered workqueues are always bound to the fallback default worker
pool. Why not just adjust cpus_allowed of the worker pool?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-22 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-14 16:38 [RFC PATCH 0/3] workqueue: Control cpu affinity of !WQ_SYSFS unbound workqueues Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-14 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Move workqueue bus attr to device attribute Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-14 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] workqueues: Account unbound workqueue in a seperate list Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-14 18:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-03-15 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-14 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] workqueue: Add anon workqueue sysfs hierarchy Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-14 19:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-03-17 14:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-22 17:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-22 18:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-03-22 22:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-14 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] workqueue: Control cpu affinity of !WQ_SYSFS unbound workqueues Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140322185551.GA24945@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox