From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: machine_power_off should not return
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:45:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140325224554.GC12185@arch.cereza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395684784-12601-1-git-send-email-sebastian.capella@linaro.org>
Let's Cc: LAKML, and To: Russell.
Russell, any comments on this?
Without this patch we got the heartbeat's reboot_notifier called twice while
testing the recent hibernation patches, which was unexpected and produced a
kernel panic: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/19/363
Instead of fixing the heartbeat LED trigger, or the hibernation code, it
seems better to fix the ARM machine_power_off, as it's not supposed to return.
On Mar 24, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> Add loop to prevent return from machine_power_off if
> pm_power_off is null or does not halt the system.
> This caused a panic during hibernation testing on Kirkwood
> Openblocks A6 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@linaro.org>
> Reported-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> index f58b723..6ffdc2c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
>
> if (pm_power_off)
> pm_power_off();
> + while (1)
> + cpu_relax();
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-25 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-24 18:13 [PATCH] ARM: machine_power_off should not return Sebastian Capella
2014-03-25 22:45 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2014-03-26 0:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-03-26 10:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-03-26 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140325224554.GC12185@arch.cereza \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sebastian.capella@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox